data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
AI
compare
Although the slur in A is missing its ending in bar 33 (in a new line of text), Chopin must have intended that slur to reach f1 in that bar, which is evident from:
- the slur shape in bar 32,
- omission of a wedge at the beginning of bar 33, which confirms Chopin's weakened attention when writing that fragment,
- slur extension in analogous bars 28-29,
- slurs of AI in all the analogous bar.
This is how the slur was interpreted in GE (→FE→EE).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs