CGS
compare
In CGS the 
marks were written very inaccurately – by the end of each of the semiquaver groups. Moreover, the first 
mark was also omitted. It was most probably related to the lack of space under the bottom stave due to the low-placed beams (except for GE, in the sources the semiquaver stems are pointing downwards). It seems that the copyist cared more about an aesthetic entry in an album than about the precise placement of indications, which she could have considered obvious.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Pedalling