![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Fontana's revisions
b. 15-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
In A Chopin applied signs indicating a repetition of the preceding figure to mark b. 15 and the L.H. part in b. 32. In FC Fontana also used an abbreviation to mark b. 16 (which resulted in a mistake) and the R.H. part in b. 32. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A , Fontana's revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 29-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
In these bars, in spite of the strict analogy to b. 13-16 (except for the first two and the last semiquavers), Chopin wrote a different pedalling. Due to a dense notation and the use of an abbreviation in b. 32, it posed, however, similar challenges in its interpretation. The copyist considered – and rightly so – that leaving the last See also b. 1-4. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Fontana's revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
In the main text we keep the notation of the grace note used in A. The versions of the remaining sources result from revisions (slashed grace note in FC) or mistakes (missing slur in FE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Notation of grace notes , Fontana's revisions |