Issues : Errors of FC
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The longer slur of FC (→GE) resulted from a mistake of the copyist, most probably confused by the contour of a fragment of the slur written on the back of this page (over b. 22) blending into the slur of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
FCI does not contain any accidentals in the R.H. part in these bars. The missing sharps in b. 7 and 9 are a patent inaccuracy (formally speaking, a cautionary in b. 10 is not indispensable due to the presence of corresponding sharps in the L.H., i.e. raising c1 to c1). Such an incomplete notation was probably present already in the lost autograph that served as the basis for this copy, since it seems unlikely that the copyist would selectively omit marks on the top stave (see also b. 16-17). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
An earlier version of slurring linked to the initial rhythm – see the note on rhythm. It is also there that we discuss the mistakes in the reproduction of the slurs of A, committed both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In FC the rhythm in the 2nd half of the bar was written down as , which is a mistake. In GE it was changed to , which is understandable if we take into account the rhythm in the remaining similar situations. However, the reviser did not respect the position of that d2 in relation to the L.H. semiquavers – it is written right above the penultimate semiquaver, which suggests that it is the semiquaver flag that is a mistake, and not the missing second dot prolonging the e2 crotchet. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The omission of the hairpin both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE) is probably a result of the mark overlapping with the ending of the L.H. slur – each of the arms of the hairpin looks like an attempt to prolong/finish that slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |