![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of FC
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The longer slur of FC (→GE) resulted from a mistake of the copyist, most probably confused by the contour of a fragment of the slur written on the back of this page (over b. 22) blending into the slur of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
FCI does not contain any accidentals in the R.H. part in these bars. The missing sharps in b. 7 and 9 are a patent inaccuracy (formally speaking, a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
An earlier version of slurring linked to the initial rhythm – see the note on rhythm. It is also there that we discuss the mistakes in the reproduction of the slurs of A, committed both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In FC the rhythm in the 2nd half of the bar was written down as category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The omission of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |