![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The corrections and crossings-out visible in A reveal the changes performed both to the range and the position of the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Corrections in A , Deletions in A , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||||||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The missing arpeggio sign must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1). The omission of the sign in CGS suggests that the copy was prepared on the basis of FE. The revision of EE2 was probably based on GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |