CGS
compare
b. 22
The missing arpeggio sign must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1). The omission of the sign in CGS suggests that the copy was prepared on the basis of FE. The revision of EE2 was probably based on GE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE
notation: Ornaments