Slurs
|
b. 1-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
In As, there are no slurs whatsoever. We do not mention it in further notes. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 5-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
In EE the L.H. slur in b. 5 – the first in a new line – begins from the 1st quaver, although the slur in the previous bar suggests continuation. The inaccuracy was most probably a side effect of the slur in b. 5-7 having been moved under the notes (though otherwise justified, since the notation of FE is illogical here: the slur in b. 1-4 is led under the notes, whereas its continuation in b. 5-7 – above). Inconsistent slurs between lines are also present in FC and GE – slurs in the bars opening a new line (b. 6 and 10 in FC and 5 and 9 in GE) run from the 1st quaver of the bar, contrary to the notation at the end of the preceding lines. (We do not reproduce the inaccuracies of FC in our transcriptions due to a different division into great staves.) category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
|
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The L.H. slur, which starts at the beginning of the Prelude, clearly reaches the 1st quaver in b. 8 in A. Nevertheless, both FC (→GE) and FE (→EE) considered it an inaccuracy and led the slur only to the last quaver in b. 7. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
|
b. 9-16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The L.H. slur in b. 9-16 was not included in CGS. It must be an inaccuracy, although it cannot be ruled out that the author decided not to write this slur, since it was difficult to lead it between the parts of both hands, and its only purpose was to confirm the articulation, which had already been clearly indicated. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 13-16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The missing ending of the L.H. slur in b. 14-16 in FC must be a result of distraction of the copyist, who forgot to continue the slur in a new line (he also overlooked the slur in b. 18-19; cf. also the note to b. 5-10). This mistake – not continuing the slur in a new line – was repeated in GE, in which the slur is already absent in b. 13 due to a different division of the text into great staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE |
