data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
The missing arpeggio sign must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1). The omission of the sign in CGS suggests that the copy was prepared on the basis of FE. The revision of EE2 was probably based on GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 2, Prelude in A minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |