Issues : FE revisions
b. 80-84
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In FE (→IE) and EE the slur over the RH progression ends at the end of b. 83. This variant may have been a result of free interpretation of the notation [FC] by editors. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 148-151
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In the sources bars 148-152 have varying slurs. Since the manuscript A was partly burnt it is not possible to determine Chopin's slurring of the first two bars of the phrase. Due to the notation inaccuracies in FC3 and lack of the remaining copies we cannot tell for sure what the composer intended here. It seems almost certain however that the slur did not begin in the middle of bar 149, and given the characteristics of Tarantella's themes and inaccuracies of the slurs it may be assumed that most certainly the slur in b. 149 began on the quaver and not the beginning of the bar. Compare annotation in b. 149. Moreover, sources FE(→IE) differ from the all the rest as here the slur extends as far as the chord on the first beat in b. 152. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 156-160
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
Bars 156-159, similarly to bars 148-151 are slurred differently in the sources. The main differences fall on the first two bars of the phrase. Cf. b. 148 In FE(→IE) the slurs extend as far as the chord on the first beat in b. 160, which is different from any other sources. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |