data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In GE2 (→GE3>GE4) each beat of bars 252-259 is slurred in LH. In GE1 only the first slur is notated over the 252-253 bar line. In FE (→IE) there are only two slurs over the first and second beat of 258 i 259, and in EE only the last one was retained.
In A and FC3 this part is not written out with notes in the LH part - the notes are replaced by repetition of bars. However in A the first slur in this part is notated, while there is no such slur in FC3.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, EE inaccuracies
notation: Slurs