data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE
compare
In sources bars 152-155 are slurred differently. We see differences mainly in the first half of the phrase.
Given it is a grace notes phrase we may assume GE to be the copyist's arbitrary interpretation.
Similarly, EE version with a slur beginning in the middle of b. 154 also seems little probable.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions
notation: Slurs