data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 57
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In A1 Chopin wrote the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Centrally placed marks |
||||||||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
A1 contains only category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Balakirev's revisions , Revisions in EL |
||||||||||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In the main text we suggest the additional crotchet stems present only in A1 in a variant form – see the note in the next bar. The version of EL must be erroneous; it is most probably a Terzverschreibung of the copyist or the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In the main text we give the first a1 note as a separate semiquaver after the notation of [A2] (→CJ,CK). The crotchet in A1 conveys rather a sonic idea, whereas the accented semiquaver in [A2] – the instructions for its implementation. The simplified versions of notation in CB and EL are arbitrary revisions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Balakirev's revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In the main text we give the accent of [A2] (→CJ,CK). The accent having been moved over the minim is Balakirev's mistake or revision, who placed accents over each of the three g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Balakirev's revisions |