Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur in GE is a result of inadvertence, perhaps of the engraver, since this edition features slurs in an analogous motif in b. 11-13. The slur of FE (→EE) is inaccurate and misleading – it looks like a tie of f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Tie or slur |
||||||
|
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the version of both preserved autographs, which, assuming on the basis of GE, could also have been in [AG]. The version of FE, almost certainly proofread by Chopin, can be considered equal. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 31-32
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we take into account the accent of GE1 – it is most probably a clarification entered into [AG]. The absence of the mark in GE2 is most probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
1.
1-g
