Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 113

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Long accent in AF

Short accent on quaver in FE (→EE)

Short accent in GE

..

In the main text we give the unequivocal long accent, written in AF. The short accents in the editions must be a result of misunderstanding the manuscripts. In FE (→EE) the mark was placed under the wrong chord by mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in FE

b. 113

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Staccato dot in Af (→FEEE)

No mark in GE

..

In this bar, this time we do not include in the main text the staccato dot present in AF (→FEEE). Contrary to other dots – see b. 111-116 – it is not confirmed in any other source, both here and in analogous b. 17, 21 and 109. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 115

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Long accent in Af, probable interpretation

2 long accents in FE

L.H. short accent in EE

Short accent in GE

..

The two accents written in AF in analogous b. 19 and 111 have the characteristics that are frequently encountered in the notation of short accents – the mark tilted upwards and a relatively big angle between the arms. However, the mark in the discussed bar is less characteristic in this respect; therefore, we assume that it is a long accent. In FE (→EE) it was placed under the L.H. chord by mistake, which Chopin then corrected in the last stage of proofreading by adding a second accent under the R.H. triplet. According to us, the added accent – certainly long – tips the balance in favour of long accents in all analogous bars. The short accent in GE may be considered an alternative version. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 115

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Staccato dot in AF, GE & EE

No mark in FE

..

FE overlooked the staccato dot over the a quaver. The mark was added in EE, probably due to the dot under the L.H. octave and by analogy with, e.g. b. 111 and 113.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 116

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Staccato dot in AF & GE

No mark in FE (→EE)

..

The missing staccato dot over the c1-e1 third must be a mistake by the engraver of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE