![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
b. 121
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In this context the missing category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing b category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the pedalling markings written in AF (→FE→EE) in analogous b. 30-31 in a variant form. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic version of AF (→FE→EE). In turn, the authenticity of the version of GE, although likely, is uncertain – it may result from a routine revision consisting in moving the slur to the side of the noteheads (in GE the stems point downwards). There are numerous examples of such changes in Chopin's pieces, cf., e.g. the Mazurka in G Minor, Op. 24 No. 1, b. 3 or the Nocturne in D category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing f category imprint: Differences between sources |