b. 121
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In this context the missing must be considered an inadvertence, hence we add it after the previous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing b1-c2 slur in GE is probably Chopin's inadvertence at the time of performing the last retouches of [AG]. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 122-123
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the pedalling markings written in AF (→FE→EE) in analogous b. 30-31 in a variant form. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic version of AF (→FE→EE). In turn, the authenticity of the version of GE, although likely, is uncertain – it may result from a routine revision consisting in moving the slur to the side of the noteheads (in GE the stems point downwards). There are numerous examples of such changes in Chopin's pieces, cf., e.g. the Mazurka in G Minor, Op. 24 No. 1, b. 3 or the Nocturne in D Major, Op. 27 No. 2, b. 76-77. Therefore, it is possible that the notation of [AG] was no different from AF. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 123-124
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing f1-g1 slur in GE seems to be an oversight. However, it is likely that, contrary to [AG], it was moved over the notes, which converted it into a tie of d2 – see the note above. category imprint: Differences between sources |