![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 64-66
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in the preceding four bars, in the main text we follow the version of AF. In FE and EE it was reproduced with minor inaccuracies concerning the placement of the pedal release mark, out of which only the shift of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 73-75
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the version of GE, which is probably later. In AF one can see that the hairpin blends with the L.H. slur, which could have prompted Chopin to use a verbal indication in [AG]. In FE the hairpin breaks at the end of the line, in b. 74, which EE reproduced in the simplest way possible by inserting a complete mark of such a range. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We reproduce the mark in AF, longer than in b. 94, as a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 101
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
FE overlooked the staccato dot over the a quaver. The mark was added in EE, probably due to the dot under the L.H. octave and by analogy with, e.g. b. 111 and 113. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »