b. 12
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AF the mark is crossed out in the place in which it is given by GE and written further, under the 3rd beat of b. 12. Therefore, we include this correction in the main text. Cf. b. 103-104. In FE (→EE) the was placed inaccurately. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
||||||||
b. 12-14
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI is devoid of L.H. slurs in these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing arpeggio mark in the autographs and in FE (→EE) is probably an inaccuracy of notation and, according to us, it does not have to mean that the chord should be played simultaneously. The same applies to b. 108. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections of AI |
||||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources |