



b. 7
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We consider that the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The absence of a separate slur for the bass voice is most probably an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE). The slur (as well as the staccato dot over G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AF both the ending of the slur in b. 8 and the beginning of the slur in b. 9 are written inaccurately, as a result of which each of the given versions may be considered an interpretation of this notation. According to us, the latter is to be interpreted as beginning from the 1st quaver of the bar, which is indicated by the similar yet more accurate versions of notation of AI and AF in analogous b. 100-101 (in AF the version prior to combining the slurs). To the main text we adopt the version of FE, perhaps proofread by Chopin (the first slur having been extended). The version of AI and GE may be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Chopin's hesitations , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |