|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
Just like in b. 4 and 28, in the main text we give the staccato dot with which Chopin provided the 1st chord of the bar in [A2] (→GE1). The fact that the mark is missing in GE2 must be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 64-65
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The version of A1, repeated after b. 8-9 – the discussed bars are not written out in the autograph – was probably abandoned by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 64-65
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The main text – the slur to the 1st quaver in b. 65 – is the version of GE (based on [A2]) and FE2, most probably proofread by Chopin. The remaining variants result from various possibilities of interpretation of the inaccurate ending of the slur of A1 in b. 8-9: the discussed bars are their non-written-out repetition in that manuscript. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 65-66
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The missing slur in these bars is a patent mistake of the engraver of GE, who forgot the last slur on the page. On the next page, in b. 67 the beginning of the slur in GE1 indicates continuation, yet GE2 – instead of adding the overlooked slur – moved that beginning of the slur so that it would not suggest continuation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
in