Rhythm
b. 376
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The dotted g minim is the original version, left in A most probably by inadvertence. It is indicated by corrections in two previous analogous places (b. 274 and 295). Chopin's distraction in this place, as well as in the entire second appearance of this section, is proven by a few evident inaccuracies, e.g. the overlooked ties of g-e1 in b. 375-376 and f-f1 in b. 392-393. The versions of FC and GE1 are probably erroneous: the copyist was copying A with a dotted minim, of which the engraver of GE1 could not have been aware. The omission of the dot in GE2 (→GE3) is probably a revision unifying that bar with the three remaining analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 392-393
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
A comparison with b. 266-267 and analog. (7 places in total) points to Chopin's patent mistake. Therefore, in the main text we include the ties added in GE2 (→GE3). The tie of f was added already in FE (→EE), which is probably a revision of the engraver, who added the missing tie in the chord on the bottom stave as part of his routine activities (such routine additions are evidenced in the Mazurka in D Major, Op. 33 No. 3, b. 8-9 and 24-25). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of A , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 394
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The origin of the version of FE is unclear. It may be Chopin's proofreading; it would be then the latest authentic version. On the other hand, one cannot exclude a mistake of the engraver: looking at the already finished, correctly engraved version of FE, the engraver could have mistakenly associated the dot prolonging the f1 minim with the e1 crotchet and could have added the allegedly missing quaver flag to the next note. The second possibility is supported by the fact that the notation of FE is not entirely correct, since extending dots should be both next to e1 and f1. One can assume that Chopin would have bothered to add the second dot if he had prolonged the 1st crotchet. In this situation we consider the version of FE only a variant of uncertain authenticity while saving the main text for the undoubtedly Chopinesque version of A. The version of FE was regarded as erroneous already in EE, in which, however, not knowing the authentic version, the rhythm of the three previous analogous bars was introduced (369, 373 and 390). The same correction was entered into FESf, which could have also been performed by analogy and which does not influence the evaluation of a possible authenticity of that version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 397
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The dotted g minim is the original version, left in A (→FC) most probably by inadvertence. The version of FE is probably a mistake, while of GE and EE – revisions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 420-421
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FE, the tie to a2 is only present in bar 421 (on the new page). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE |