b. 462
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 360, A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE1) features a reminding before g1. The mark, superfluous in this context, was removed in GE2 (→GE3) and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
|||||
b. 462
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The shape of the accent in A suggests that it is a long accent. It is even more evident in similar b. 470. In FC (→GE) both marks were reproduced as common short accents. Taking into account the fact how carefully Chopin reviewed FC, the absence of corrections in those and similar places may mean that Chopin did not always consider the type of accent used to be a priority. We consider the version with a short accent featured in the principal source to be an acceptable variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||
b. 467
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In some editions the whole-bar rest was specified with the digit 1 – above each of the staves in GE1 and EE and between the staves in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 468
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |