Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 557
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Chopin must have overlooked the arpeggio signs, which is indicated by the arpeggios in analogous b. 553, 555 and 559. The composer overlooked the signs after changing to a new page of A. The arpeggios were already added in GE and EE (in EE continuous, like before). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||||||
|
b. 560
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 560-579
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs encompassing the ostinato quaver figures in A are of different length: some reach the following crotchet, some do not. Statistically, it is the former that clearly prevail: 8 longer, 6-note slurs to only 4 shorter and 3 questionable ones (we interpret the questionable ones literally as short). The remaining sources do not show traces of Chopin's influence on the range of those slurs; except for minor inaccuracies, FC and GE1 reproduce the text of their Stichvorlagen, while FE (→EE) contain longer slurs only (we discuss b. 574-575 separately due to FE having overlooked the slur). In this situation, we base the main text on the above analysis of the notation of A; taking into account a high degree of structural and functional similarity of the discussed motifs, we suggest uniform, 6-note slurs in all figures. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||||||
|
b. 562-564
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The presence of arpeggios both in b. 560 and 566 makes us consider their absence in b. 562 and 564 to be Chopin's oversight. Therefore, in the main text we suggest adding the signs. The arpeggios were added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 568
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing arpeggio must be a result of the engravers' inattention, particularly in FE, in which the last arpeggios in this section were printed in b. 560. The mark was added in GE2 (→GE3). See also the note below and in b. 570-572. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
