Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 273-274
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The omitted ties in FE (→EE) and FC (→GE1) must be mistakes. The tie of E was added in GE2 (→GE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with the analogous places. A tie next to g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Annotations in FESf |
|||||||||
|
b. 273
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of GE1 must be erroneous in this place; Chopin crossed out the E-e octave in A here and replaced it with the E-d seventh. GE2 (→GE3) restored the version of FC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 274-276
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The longer phrase mark of FC is the original version copied (somehow inaccurately) from A: in A one can see that when it returned to Chopin after having been copied by Fontana, the composer crossed out the original ending of that phrase mark and added a new ending 2 bars earlier. The long, continuous slur in GE1 results from a misinterpretation of FC, rectified in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Deletions in A |
|||||||||
|
b. 274-275
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slurs of GE result from overinterpretation of the slightly too casually put slurs of FC, which clearly begin before the crotchet, particularly in the L.H. Such interpretation of a minor inaccuracy of FC confirms the predilection of the engravers of GE, known from other Chopin's pieces, for adjusting slurs and dynamic hairpins to rhythmic units, e.g. bars. See also b. 273. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 278-280
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
tied in 
