



b. 95-96
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slur in A is inconspicuous, which explains it having been overlooked in the remaining sources. However, it was certainly intended by Chopin, since an identical indication is present in analogous b. 227-228. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The quaver in FE (→EE) is almost certainly a mistake: in analog. b. 228 A also features a crotchet, which practically rules out the possibility of Chopin having overlooked a quaver flag. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
b. 99-100
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
b. 100-101
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The tie of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |