Issues : Rhythmic errors
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE features an erroneous rhythm on the 2nd quaver of the bar, i.e. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
|
b. 294-295
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we correct the minor inaccuracy of the notation of the rhythm in FE (→EE). The missing dot prolonging the e1 quaver in bar 294 could have also contributed to the omission of the tie of that note in GE, although, according to us, it is more likely that the tie was added by Chopin in the last stage of proofreading of FE. The crossing-out of the e1 quaver at the beginning of bar 295 visible in FEH emphasises that the note should not be played again in this place. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Inaccuracies in FE , Rhythmic errors , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FEH |
|||||
|
b. 469
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the second note in the L.H. is a crotchet, as a result of which the bar contains 5 quavers. The mistake, resulting from an inaccurate proofreading (the note was being changed from b to f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
|||||
|
b. 479
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE1 (→GE2), the last note of the 3rd triplet is a semiquaver, like the remaining ones. The mistake was corrected in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
– one beam is missing.
1, so the engraver might have erroneously printed here the next bar), was corrected in