



Issues : EE revisions
b. 1-5
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the last quaver in the L.H. is a B1-G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The authenticity of the grace note in the form of a small crotchet raises serious doubts – a small quaver occurs here in the Flute I part of FEorch (→GEorch). The discussed notation was found erroneous already in GE and EE, and both introduced forms of grace notes may be considered to be potentially compliant with the notation of [A]. In the main text, we adopt slashed quavers, most frequently used by Chopin. See I mov., bar 250. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The rest on the top stave is most probably a mistake – in this bar, both parts are still written on the bottom stave. This is how it was interpreted in EE and GE3, where the rest was removed. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Due to the fact that the octave sign used to write the 1st half of the next bar was started too early, the last semiquaver in FE is an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 34-36
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
EE reproduced the distinct long accents of FE (→GE1→GE2) as short. In GE3, the mark in bar 34 was changed to a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |