Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
|
b. 150-151
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Initially, the fingering of FEH repeats the idea written in the previous bars. In the descending part of the passage, the fingering scheme of the ascending part is preserved, with a small exception for a convenient passing-over – the 2nd and not the 3rd finger on the 5th semiquaver of bar 151. That fingering could have been indicated by Chopin; however, since we are not able to confirm that possibility, we do not include it in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 152-154
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In spite of differences, the indications of both sources probably represent the same fingering. A possible difference may concern only the 1st semiquaver of bar 152 – the missing marking in EE suggests the use of the 2nd finger, which is more natural for this scheme. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 154-155
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 156-157
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur added in FED contains a suggestion both in terms of articulation – legato of three subsequent dyads – and in terms of rhythm and phrase due to the emphasis on the quasi-syncopated rhythm of the octaves in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 156-158
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
