Issues : EE revisions
b. 464
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems that the accents here and in bar 469 were misplaced in FE. In the discussed bar, the mark was probably supposed to concern the crotchet in the L.H. Such an interpretation was adopted in GE3; however, it is only one of a few possibilities, out of which all the major ones are represented in the sources. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 466-470
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we preserve the version of FE (→GE1→GE2), devoid of accents in the L.H. in bars 466 and 470. In EE, accents were added in both bars, in GE3 – only in bar 470. We consider the additions to be unjustified due to the function of this bar in the structure of the two- and four-bar section – see bar 458. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 468-469
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we suggest adding long accents after analogous bars 460-461 and 456-457 and 464-465. Accents (short) were added already in EE as well as in GE3. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 469
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the second note in the L.H. is a crotchet, as a result of which the bar contains 5 quavers. The mistake, resulting from an inaccurate proofreading (the note was being changed from b to f1, so the engraver might have erroneously printed here the next bar), was corrected in EE and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Rhythmic errors , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||
b. 469
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems likely that the accent in FE (→GE1→GE2) was placed over a wrong note (instead of over the dotted g3 quaver). This is how it was interpreted in EE and GE3, in which this mark was omitted, and an accent in the middle of the bar was added. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |