mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 477

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Short accent in FE (→GE,EE)

Long accent suggested by the editors
..

Just like in bar 473, we suggest a long accent in the main text, assuming an inaccurate reproduction of the Chopinesque mark in [A].

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 480-481

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Wedge in FE (→EE)

2 wedges in GE

3 dots suggested by the editors
..

The articulation markings of the first three quavers of this section are most probably inaccurate in FE (→EE). The addition introduced in GE, locally justified, seems to be inaccurate if we look at the eight-bar section, starting here, as a whole, e.g. due to the missing staccato mark over the last quaver in bar 480. In the main text, we unify the markings with the further part of this fragment, in which all quavers are consistently provided with dots.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Wedges

b. 483

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

in FE (→EE)

​​​​​​​ in GE1 (→GE2)

Short accents in GE3

Long accents suggested by the editors
..

A comparison with analogous bar 487 proves that two ​​​​​​​ marks are supposed to be accents, hence in the main text we give them the form of long accents. In GE3, a more radical change was introduced, since the accents are short, just like in bar 487.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 505-508

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Long accent in FE

​​​​​​​ in GE & EE

Short accent suggested by the editors
..

The mark under the 2nd triplet is a long accent or a short diminuendo, and both interpretations can be considered justified. However, having analysed all three analogous bars (bars 504-505 and 508), in the main text we adopt a short accent after bar 504.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , GE revisions

b. 508

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Long accents in FE (→EE)

3  in GE1 (→GE2)

3 short accents in GE3
..

In the majority of the editions, the three markings are long accents or short diminuendoes. Admittedly, it is difficult to differentiate between them in this context; therefore, the classification adopted by us cannot be considered conclusive. In the main text, we tend to the interpretation applied in GE3, considering the notation of analogous bar 504 to be more accurate.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness

issues: Long accents , GE revisions