Pitch
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 280
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It seems to be unlikely that the missing e on the 3rd quaver could have been considered a mistake, which could have been suggested by a comparison with analogous bars. In FE, a corresponding note is absent also in the next bar, thus both bars refer to the shape of the accompaniment in the previous phrase (bars 272-279). Therefore, we consider the revisions of EE and GE3 to be unjustified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added e on the 3rd quaver is a revision of GE3, both arbitrary and unjustified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to determine what the motivation of the reviser of GE3 was when he was changing the 2nd quaver of the bar, since it is the 4th quaver that differs from the respective dyads in the analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 287
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE is missing the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE |
before the last f
1. The accidental was added already in 
restoring a2 in the middle of the bar. It may mean that the accidental could have been added in the last proofreading of