Slurs
b. 300-301
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 309-314
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In this place, the absence of slurs must be considered Chopin's oversight. In the main text, we suggest slurs modelled after analogous bars 81-86. Slurs were added also in GE3, which took as an example its own slurring in bars 81-83 (the slur in the next bars was not added). See also bars 312-313. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 333
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Leading the slur to the 2nd semiquaver of the 2nd half of the bar is most probably an inaccuracy of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2). In the main text, we shorten the slur, since we believe that the slurs over analogous motifs in this and the next phrase should end in the same place. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 333-334
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Replacing the g1-g2 slur with three staccato dots is a totally unjustified arbitrary change of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 333-335
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs over the quavers of the top voice in the L.H. in bars 333 and 335 are an arbitrary addition of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |