data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In FEH, the ties of the d1-f
1 third were crossed out. The authenticity of this variant seems to be highly likely if we take into account a number of other, almost certainly Chopinesque, variants entered into that copy. The manner the marks were crossed out resembles the Chopinesque one – cf. e.g. crossings-out in the pupil's copy of the Nocturne in D
Major, Op. 27 No. 2, bar 45. In the main text, we signalise the possibility of omitting the ties with brackets.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Authentic post-publication changes and variants, Annotations in FEH
notation: Rhythm