Issues : Omissions to cancel alteration
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the last third on the 3rd crotchet in the bar in FE (→GE1→GE2), there is no restoring e2. The correct notation is featured in EE and GE3; the mark was also added in FES. In melodic lines led in thirds, such mistakes would happen to Chopin quite often – cf. e.g. bars 88 and 90 in this movement of the Concerto as well as the Etude in G minor, op. 25, no. 6, bar 12 or the Mazurka in E major, op. 6, no. 3, bars 11, 13 and analog. A similar situation in bar 41. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE |
|
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE |
|
b. 88-90
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), there is no restoring b2 in the 2nd group of grace notes and no restoring f1 in the last group in the L.H. These harmonically patent oversights of Chopin were corrected only in GE3 and, partially, in the pupils' copies: a was added in FES, a – in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FEH |