![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic post-publication changes and variants
b. 49
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FEH, the ending of this bar was provided with two diagonal crosses, with which Chopin would often mark places discussed during lessons, most probably problematic. Moreover, there is an ambiguous entry between a category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The arpeggio with a grace note, added in FEH, is a very characteristic ornament of Chopin – cf. e.g. the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 2nd mov., bar 75 or bar 17 and 85. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||||
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The notation of the variant written in FEH extending the roulade, so that it ends at the beginning of bar 59 with the c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The meaning of the curved line between the c The passage filling 5 quavers was added in FES on the margin, next to the line containing bars 59-62, without indicating the place it should be inserted in the printed text. According to us, there are two such places – the 1st half of bar 59 (as an A major passage) or 5 last quavers in bar 61 (as an A minor passage). The latter seems to be more likely due to a similar nature of the passage written in this bar in FEH, hence we adopt the variant placed in bar 61 as the text of FES. The literal interpretation of the variant of FEH excludes a simultaneous application of the interpretation of the passage of FES discussed above. Another interpretation of the entry in FEH – see the note in the further part of this bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Tenuto slurs , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||||||
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Interpretation of the draft notation in FED is hypothetical to a significant extent – it is only 3 note heads that are written on the ledger lines, without stems or beams. Therefore, it is unknown in which rhythm they should be performed; their pitch is also unclear, since only the middle one is a distinctly written c
According to us, such a placement of repeated c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEH |