![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FES
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
FE feature an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 74-75
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FES, there are added sharps before e category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE, there are no accidentals before the 2nd octave, which is a patent oversight, corrected both in GE and EE. A sharp before a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Last key signature sign |
||||||||
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The additions in both copies certainly mark the same fingering. In the main text, we suggest the digits written by Chopin's hand in FES, defining this fingering in an efficient manner by indicating the moments of hand position changes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |