![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Like in analogous bar 17, in the main text we suggest a whole-bar slur in the part of the L.H. Such a slur was added in GE3, whereas in EE, each half of the bar was embraced with a separate slur, perhaps due to the lack of space. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Chopin generally does not write rests in the solo part where the reduction of the orchestral part complements the rhythm – cf. e.g. bar 12, 22, 38 and analog. However, in this case the rhythmic values of both parts do not clearly combine themselves – the g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
FE feature an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
b. 74
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Nothing indicates the authenticity of the versions of GE or EE – the first is most probably a result of an oversight, the second – a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |