Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Slurs

b. 53

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Slur in FE (→EE)

No slur in GE

..

We regard the lack of slur as an oversight by the engraver of GE1, although it could have been added in FE at the last stage of proofreading.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 54

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No slurs in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Slur in GE3

Our alternative suggestion (2 slurs)

..

In FE (→EE,GE1GE2), there are no slurs in the L.H., differently than in analogous bar 13. In GE3, a slur over the 1st half of the bar was added; it is difficult to say what the motivation of the reviser was for adding only one slur in this bar. In the main text, we preserve the notation of FE, since Chopin most probably considered the legato indication to be enough – cf. e.g. the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 1st mov., bar 139, in which the sempre legato indication replaced the slurs present in an analogous place. On the other hand, it cannot be excluded that legato was added as an easier way of correcting the accidentally overlooked slurs – in the entire theme (bars 54-62), Chopin provides the accompaniment with slurs already from the next bar (except for bar 58). Due to this reason, we suggest adding slurs in the discussed bar as an alternative solution.     

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Legato & slurs

b. 54

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

2 slurs in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

3 slurs in GE3

..

Change of slurring in GE3 is a typical example of a routine revision – a separate slur for the 2nd beat of the bar resembles rather bowing than a pianistic gesture.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 58

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No slurs in FE (→GE1GE2)

2 slurs in EE

Slur in GE3

Slur suggested by the editors

..

Like in analogous bar 17, in the main text we suggest a whole-bar slur in the part of the L.H. Such a slur was added in GE3, whereas in EE, each half of the bar was embraced with a separate slur, perhaps due to the lack of space. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 59-60

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Slur to chord in FE (→EE)

Slur over triplet in GE

..

It is unknown how the difference in the range of the slur occurred. According to us, it is an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE that is most likely.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE