Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 91

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No marks in FE (→EE)

Wedges in GE

..

According to us, the missing wedges over the topmost notes on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar is an inaccuracy – cf. the wedges in analogous bar 42 as well as the precise notation in bar 89. Due to this reason, we introduce the markings added in GE to the main text, although the likelihood of them having been added by Chopin is marginal.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 91

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

5th finger indicated in FEH

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 91

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FE, there are no accidentals before the 4th semiquaver in the R.H. and the bottom note of the 3rd quaver in the L.H. Oversights of the symbols of the current key, typical of Chopin, were corrected both in GE and EE. A sharp in the L.H. was added also in FEH and FES. In the latter, cautionary double sharps before fon the 2nd and 4th beats of the bar were also added.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES , Last key signature sign , Annotations in FEH

b. 92-94

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Slur up to bar 94 in FE

No slur in GE

Slur up to end of bar 93 in EE

..

It is difficult to consider the missing slur in GE an oversight, since the slur in FE consists of two sections in two lines of the text. Therefore, the engraver of GE would have had to overlook two marks (as well as the wedges at the beginning of bar 94). It means that the slur was almost certainly added by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE. A shorter slur in EE is probably a result of the engraver's inaccuracy.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 92

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FES there is a  written in before b1 in the chord on the 3rd beat.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Cautionary accidentals , Annotations in FES