Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Placing the mark only next to the 2nd crotchet in the bar is probably an example of the Chopinesque manner of placing indications within, and not at the beginning of, their scope of validity. Nowadays, such notation is not used, hence in the main text we move the mark to the beginning of the bar, accordingly to the musical sense. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of both dynamic markings – see the previous note – suggests an oversight of the engraver of GE; however, it cannot be excluded that Chopin added them in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Leading the dashes marking the range of smorz. only to the 2nd beat of the bar must be considered an inaccuracy – the indication is almost certainly to be valid until rallent. – just like in GE – or until the end of the bar, which we suggest in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The return to tempo is marked in FE (→EE) only in the solo part, in bar 105. Tempo 1o introduced a bar earlier in GE is most probably an editorial revision – cf. a similar situation in bar 52. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »