



Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Placing the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks |
||||||
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of both dynamic markings – see the previous note – suggests an oversight of the engraver of GE; however, it cannot be excluded that Chopin added them in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
Leading the dashes marking the range of smorz. only to the 2nd beat of the bar must be considered an inaccuracy – the indication is almost certainly to be valid until rallent. – just like in GE – or until the end of the bar, which we suggest in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The return to tempo is marked in FE (→EE) only in the solo part, in bar 105. Tempo 1o introduced a bar earlier in GE is most probably an editorial revision – cf. a similar situation in bar 52. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »