mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Fingering
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Fingering

b. 106-108

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

Fingering based on FES

Fingering written into FEH in bar 108

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 108

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

..

In FES, there is a fingering digit ('1') written by the pupil's hand over the 7th semiquaver. It must be a mistake, since such a fingering is contrary to the digits written there by Chopin – see bars 106-108. Cf. the comment on bar 116. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES

b. 109

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE
..

The fingerings of three sources, although marked differently, are completely compliant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 109

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fingering in EE
..

In this bar, differently than in analogous bar 105, the fingering added by Fontana in EE clarifies the combination of the scale sequence with the figure based on the broken chord.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 110

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

No teaching fingering
..

The digits written in FES in pencil are not only poorly visible, but they could have also been changed, as a result of which one can see more than one digit in some of the annotations. The markings over c3 (4?), c3 (4 or 5) and f2 and e2 (1 or 2) are particularly difficult to decipher. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES