Issues : Annotations in FEH
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The missing tie of e may be an oversight of the engraver of EE1, corrected in EE2 (→EE3). However, it cannot be excluded that the omission of the tie was a decision of the reviser who considered the tie to be a mistake, noticing that Chopin could have written e as a semibreve, like in bar 116. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give the fingering of FES, written in pencil probably by Chopin and enhanced with ink by J. Stirling. The same fingering, marked with a different set of digits, is featured in FEH and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we include the fingering of FES, based almost certainly on Chopinesque indications. An identical fingering is featured also in FEH. This part of figuration was provided with fingering also by Fontana in EE; however, he suggested transferring the hand instead of a cross-over over the 1st finger. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |