![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FES
b. 112
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The digit, marking the hand position, written in FES most probably defines the same fingering that was described in FEH in more detail. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
b. 112
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The fingering of FES confirms the authenticity of the repetition of the c category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The change of f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FES |
||||||||||||
b. 114
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||||
b. 116
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we suggest a compilation of complementary Chopin's entries performed in pencil in FED and FES. J. Stirling probably wanted to enhance with ink the second out of four ones written in her copy, over the g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |