Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 46

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES

b. 46

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Short accent in FE (→GE,EE)

Long accent suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest a long accent after analogous bars 48 and 95. It is a typical context for long accents, hence we can safely assume that the notation in those two bars conveys the notation of [A] in a more faithful manner.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 47

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

3 slurs in FE

2 slurs in GE1 (→GE2)

2 slurs in EE

1 slur in GE3

..

In the main text, we give the complete slurring of FE. The versions of EE and GE1 (→GE2) are most probably a result of the engravers' mistakes. A single slur in GE3 is probably modelled after the slurring of an analogous phrase in bars 95-96.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 47-48

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH

b. 47

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

 in FE (→EE)

 in GE

..

The change of direction of the dynamic hairpin is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Sign reversal