b. 46
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we suggest a long accent after analogous bars 48 and 95. It is a typical context for long accents, hence we can safely assume that the notation in those two bars conveys the notation of [A] in a more faithful manner. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give the complete slurring of FE. The versions of EE and GE1 (→GE2) are most probably a result of the engravers' mistakes. A single slur in GE3 is probably modelled after the slurring of an analogous phrase in bars 95-96. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The change of direction of the dynamic hairpin is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Sign reversal |