Issues : Annotations in FES
b. 106-108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The 2nd note in FE (→GE) is a d. Chopin corrected this patent mistake in FED and FES. EE also include the correct version. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FES, there is a fingering digit ('1') written by the pupil's hand over the 7th semiquaver. It must be a mistake, since such a fingering is contrary to the digits written there by Chopin – see bars 106-108. Cf. the comment on bar 116. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||||
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The fingerings of three sources, although marked differently, are completely compliant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||||
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The digits written in FES in pencil are not only poorly visible, but they could have also been changed, as a result of which one can see more than one digit in some of the annotations. The markings over c3 (4?), c3 (4 or 5) and f2 and e2 (1 or 2) are particularly difficult to decipher. category imprint: Differences between sources |