![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors resulting from corrections
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, Chopin changed the initially written category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, the R.H. part is written in this bar twice, most probably due to the non-inclusion of the bottom voice on the 3rd beat of the bar for the 1st time. In the corrected version, Chopin, however, overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||
b. 60-61
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in Atut reaches the E1-E octave and it was extended to that end. However, after having written the 1st half of bar 61, Chopin deleted the octave to change the manner of notation of the R.H. part. The discussed slur was not crossed, but in rewritten bar 61, the ending of the slur was not repeated, which explains its shorter range in the editions. A separate slur for the top notes of the octaves added in EE must be an editorial revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||||||
b. 134
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, one can see traces of corrections (erasures), as a result of which some places were spilled with ink, so that it is unclear what is actually written on the top stave. However, since the clearly visible elements perfectly correspond to the orchestral part of FEorch (→GEorch), it is this version that we adopt as the text of Atut. In turn, the text of the editions, clearly different, does not bear traces of corrections in print in FE, which, however, does not mean that there were none – adding an element, e.g. a note, did not have to leave any trace. According to us, the following scenario is likely, among other things – the engraver of FE overlooked the dotted a minim on the bottom stave, which was corrected by Chopin, who added an a crotchet on the 3rd beat of the bar. Both source versions can be considered intended by Chopin. Then again, taking into account the probably most reliable elements of both versions – playing a on the 1st and 3rd beats of the bar, in the main text we suggest a version including both. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |