Issues : EE revisions
b. 630
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 633
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of accidentals in FE, although faultless, is illogical – a cautionary before e1 appears only just before the 4th quaver, while the before c2 is unnecessarily repeated in the 2nd group of semiquavers. The remaining editions took an attempt at ordering the notation:
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 636
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A sharp raising c2 to c2 appears in FE (→GE1→GE2,→EE1→EE2) only just before the 4th quaver of the bottom voice. Chopin would write an accidental too late on a few occasions (e.g. in the Etude in F Major, Op. 10 No. 8, bar 43). An accidental at the beginning of the bar was added in EE3 and GE3, yet it was only GE3 that removed the in the middle of the bar, unnecessary in this situation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||
b. 637
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 638-640
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accents is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1) – bar 638 opens a new line of text, which would often cause distraction and defects of various kind. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |