Issues : GE revisions
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE, a was added before the topmost note of the 5th quaver, g2. It is probably a cautionary mark that should have been placed in the previous bar, where it would be justified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 46-47
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The interpretation of the slurs of Atut by the engraver of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) may be considered justified, since the notation of the manuscript is most probably inaccurate. In the main text, we give a different interpretation of Atut, based on the assumption that the similarly looking beginnings of the slurs in bars 45 and 47 convey the same message – slurs from the beginning of the semiquaver tremolando (however, cf. the note in bar 45). This solution was adopted in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we give the staccato dots after Atut. In FE (→EE), the marks were misplaced (they were placed under the 2nd and 3rd octaves). In GE, the whole was deemed to be a mistake and both dots were removed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 50-51
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The shorter slur in Atut (→FE→GE1→GE2) is the original marking. Initially, both slurs in the previous figure also encompassed the groups of three quavers only; however, they were then prolonged by Chopin. The slur in the L.H. in the discussed bars, written last, already encompasses the entire four-note motif. The fact of leaving the slur in the R.H. without extension must be the composer's inadvertence. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||
b. 56-57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in the case of portato dots, the majority of the editions overlooked an authentic slur, most probably due to a mistake of the engraver of FE. In GE3, a slur was added in bar 57 after an analogous slur in bar 55 as well as a parallel slur in the L.H. part. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |