Issues : Accidentals in different octaves
b. 391
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no before f2, which was a frequently used procedure in this layout – it was the mark placed earlier before a note sounding an octave higher, but written at the same pitch that was considered to be valid. The remaining editions added a . category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|
b. 405-407
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In bar 405 and 407, there are no naturals lowering f to f in FE. These patent inaccuracies were corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|
b. 408
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no lowering f to f. The patent inaccuracy of the Chopinesque notation was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|
b. 416-423
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there are no sharps before the second semiquaver, placed an octave lower than the first one, of the majority of the figures in the L.H. – marks are necessary in 10 out of 15 figures, whereas an appropriate is present only before c1 in bar 418. All the remaining marks were added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|
b. 424
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources, there are no sharps before the d2 and d3 semiquavers. It results from a different rule of validity of accidentals from the one applied generally in contemporary editions where a part of a bar is written with the use of an octave sign. In Chopin's times, a mark next to a note encompassed with an octave sign was often considered valid also for a note written at the same pitch, yet not encompassed with an octave sign. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |