Issues : EE revisions
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
We consider the omitted accent under the beginning of the characteristic motif, imitated in the parts of French horns, bassoons and clarinets, to be Chopin's inadvertence. The mark is present in analogous bar 116, whereas in the part of bassoons, both bars are marked in the same way. The accent was added in EE, probably on the basis of comparison with bar 116. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 111-114
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut (→FE), the slurring of the bass motifs is less accurate here than for the first time (bars 99-102) – the slur encompasses only the quavers in bar 111. According to us, it was caused by the fact that bar 111 is the last one on a page of Atut – while finishing that page, Chopin entered a slur under the part of motif he saw and, due to haste, forgot about the slurs on the next page. It also seems that the slur encompassing the first 3 quavers was the original idea – the shape of the slur in bars 99-100, written first, suggests that Chopin decided to lead it further, to the crotchet, only at the moment of writing it. Taking that into account, in the main text, in bars 111-114, we suggest such slurs as in analogous bars 99-102. In GE and EE, the shorter slur in bar 111 was kept and a similar one was added in bar 113. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 125-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
An additional tie of e is almost certainly an arbitrary revision of EE. Chopin proofread FE, adding similar ties in the two previous bars; in spite of a minor inaccuracy in the implementation of that proofreading, there is no reason to assume that he then overlooked a tie in that place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the raising d1 to d1 was overlooked. The patent mistake was corrected in the remaining editions. The mark was added also in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||
b. 139
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no raising d2 to d2. The patent mistake was corrected in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |